Iterated Belief Revision: A Computational Approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
The capability of revising its beliefs upon new information in a rational and efficient way is crucial for an intelligent agent. The classic AGM theory studies mathematically idealized models of belief revision in two aspects: the properties (i.e., the AGM postulates) a rational revision operator should satisfy; and how to construct concrete revision operators. In scenarios where new information arrives in sequence, rational revision operators should also respect postulates for iterated revision (e.g., the DP postulates). When applications are concerned, the idealization of the AGM theory has to be lifted, in particular, beliefs of an agent should be represented by a finite belief base. In this paper, we present a computational base revision operator, which satisfies the AGM postulates and postulates for iterated revision. We will show that our base revision operator is almost optimal in terms of computational complexity. Furthermore, the base revision operator’s degrees of syntax relevance and minimal change are also formally analyzed. Topic Area: Iterated Base Revision, Computational Complexity, Syntax Irrelevance, Minimal Change Acknowledgments The first author is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under grant no. Gr 334/3. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 05321 Belief Change in Rational Agents: Perspectives from Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, and Economics http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/359
منابع مشابه
Belief Change in Reasoning Agents
The capability of changing beliefs upon new information in a rational and efficient way is crucial for an intelligent agent. Belief change therefore is one of the central research fields in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for over two decades. In the AI literature, two different kinds of belief change operations have been intensively investigated: belief update, which deal with situations where th...
متن کاملParallel belief revision: Revising by sets of formulas
The area of belief revision studies how a rational agent may incorporate new information about a domain into its belief corpus. An agent is characterized by a belief stateK, and receives a new item of information α which is to be included among its set of beliefs. Revision then is a function from a belief state and a formula to a new belief state. We propose here a more general framework for be...
متن کاملMultiple Iterated Belief Revision Without Independence
Multiple iterated revision needs advanced belief revision techniques beyond the classical AGM theory that are able to integrate several (propositional) pieces of new information into epistemic states. A crucial feature of this kind of revision is that the multiple pieces of information should be dealt with separately, which has usually been understood as requiring some kind of independence amon...
متن کاملIterated Belief Contraction from First Principles
Importance of contraction for belief change notwithstanding, literature on iterated belief change has by and large centered around the issue of iterated belief revision, ignoring the problem of iterated belief contraction. In this paper we examine iterated belief contraction in a principled way, starting with Qualified Insertion, a proposal by Hans Rott. We show that a judicious combination of ...
متن کاملA Semantic Approach for Iterated Revision in Possibilistic Logic
In this paper, we propose a new approach for iterated revision in possibilistic logic by applying a one-step revision operator. We first argue that the set of KM postulates for revision is too strong to define a practical one-step revision operator and some of them should be weakened. We then present a semantic approach for iterated revision in possibilistic logic using a one-step revision oper...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005